Search This Blog

Friday, October 13, 2017

Trump just said he wants to take NBC off air cuz they ran negative story on him



    1. Boards
    2. Current Events
    3. Trump just said he wants to take NBC off air cuz they ran negative story on him
    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/918112884630093825

    oh my god he's like a comic book fascist hahahahaha no subtlety
    eston 2 days ago#2
    --kresnik-- 2 days ago#3
    eston posted...
    Good thing he doesn't have the power to do that

    But don't tell him

    He didn't "have the power" to make the NFL crybabies stand, but he sure did. He needs to make a public appearance, in which he announces massive personal lawsuits against the major news outlets for lying and claiming he'd been raped. That's slander and they need to pay. 

    If he did that, they would be FORCED to cover what was going on and they would literally be finished. Trump News Network for the win.
    And that's the bottom line, cuz southcoast said so. 
    If you sit for the anthem, then you sit for the game.
    UnholyMudcrab  needs big 32 days ago#4
    darkjedilink 2 days ago#5
    To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

    Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.
    'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
    Antifar 2 days ago#6
    --kresnik-- posted...
    He needs to make a public appearance, in which he announces massive personal lawsuits against the major news outlets for lying and claiming he'd been raped. That's slander and they need to pay.

    No, that would be totalitarian bullshit.
    kin to all that throbs
    Zeeak4444 2 days ago#7
    --kresnik-- posted...
    eston posted...
    Good thing he doesn't have the power to do that

    But don't tell him

    He didn't "have the power" to make the NFL crybabies stand, but he sure did. He needs to make a public appearance, in which he announces massive personal lawsuits against the major news outlets for lying and claiming he'd been raped. That's slander and they need to pay. 

    If he did that, they would be FORCED to cover what was going on and they would literally be finished. Trump News Network for the win.


    Tell your idol to stop being a little bitch and man up as a president should.
    Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
    (edited 2 days ago)reportquote
    --kresnik-- posted...
    eston posted...
    Good thing he doesn't have the power to do that

    But don't tell him

    He didn't "have the power" to make the NFL crybabies stand, but he sure did. He needs to make a public appearance, in which he announces massive personal lawsuits against the major news outlets for lying and claiming he'd been raped. That's slander and they need to pay. 

    If he did that, they would be FORCED to cover what was going on and they would literally be finished. Trump News Network for the win.


    Hey, Southcoast said something ignorant. I didn't realize this was a day that ended in Y
    I am Amp
    Zeeak4444 2 days ago#9
    @darkjedilink posted...
    To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

    Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.


    Where the proof from yesterday's claims. I'm still waiting.

    Oh, that's right, you're never intellectually honest or factually correct.
    Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
    #10
    (message deleted)
    CrimsonRage 2 days ago#11
    Antifar posted...
    --kresnik-- posted...
    He needs to make a public appearance, in which he announces massive personal lawsuits against the major news outlets for lying and claiming he'd been raped. That's slander and they need to pay.

    No, that would be totalitarian bullshit.


    southcoast has always implied he'd like to live in a Trump dictatorship.
    Dragon56 2 days ago#12
    cronald crump
    Antifar 2 days ago#13
    It's useful to see how these sorts of things are reported when they happen in other countries: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/01/world/americas/01venez.html
    kin to all that throbs
    Southcoast wonders why people don't like him, lol.
    I am Amp
    EverHeardOfIt 2 days ago#15
    darkjedilink posted...
    To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

    Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.

    The story was negative, not false. Trump claims everything is fake, what do you expect?
    eston 2 days ago#16
    darkjedilink posted...
    To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

    Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.

    He claims It's false, however the original story has four inside sources. Whether the story turns out to be true or not, that is news.

    It was the same thing with the Russian pee tape. There was never any proof the actual tape existed, but the documents and official reports did exist and that's what made it newsworthy.
    The saddest part about southcoast is that he's not even trolling with his outlandish statements. He's just legitimately awful.
    MikeArmstrong posted...
    The saddest part about southcoast is that he's not even trolling with his outlandish statements. He's just legitimately awful.


    Indeed, I believe a weasel would have more ethics and honor than SC.
    I am Amp
    eston posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

    Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.

    He claims It's false, however the original story has four inside sources. Whether the story turns out to be true or not, that is news.

    It was the same thing with the Russian pee tape. There was never any proof the actual tape existed, but the documents and official reports did exist and that's what made it newsworthy.

    'Inside sources'

    Is it newsworthy? Absolutely. However, TC's claim is false.
    'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
    EverHeardOfIt posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

    Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.

    The story was negative, not false. Trump claims everything is fake, what do you expect?

    Really? You were in the meeting?
    'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
    can his fatass have a heart attack already so we can be saved from his lunatic ass
    Ask me if I would eat da booty.
    EverHeardOfIt 1 day ago#22
    darkjedilink posted...
    EverHeardOfIt posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

    Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.

    The story was negative, not false. Trump claims everything is fake, what do you expect?

    Really? You were in the meeting?

    Just based on his track record if Trump says something is fake it's probably true.
    (edited 1 day ago)reportquote
    Antifar posted...
    It's useful to see how these sorts of things are reported when they happen in other countries: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/01/world/americas/01venez.html

    Now there's a guy our President should emulate. Hugo fucking Chavez
    He didn't mind spreading fake news to these news outlets about Obama being a Muslim. 

    Now it's a problem when they're slandering him lol.
    PSN: Adrian396
    XBL: Prime Legacy Nintendo ID: Apocalypse
    Heineken14 1 day ago#25
    darkjedilink posted...
    To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

    Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.


    This is Donnie's 'merica now. You don't have to be honest, factually correct, or intellectual any longer. Just say shit. Say it loud and say it often and you're golden!
    Rage is a hell of an anesthetic.
    EverHeardOfIt 1 day ago#26
    darkjedilink posted...

    'Inside sources'

    Is it newsworthy? Absolutely. However, TC's claim is false.

    Dude he wants them off the air because the story is negative. If the story were fake and positive he wouldn't give a shit. If the story were negative and real he'd still call it fake. Negative is the relevant quality here.
    (edited 1 day ago)reportquote
    Antifar 1 day ago#27
    darkjedilink posted...

    'Inside sources'

    Is it newsworthy? Absolutely. However, TC's claim is false.

    You're accusing NBC of fabricating this story without any proof. And you're gonna need proof.
    kin to all that throbs
    E32005 1 day ago#28
    If you still support trump you’re a traitor
    Santorin 1 day ago#29
    E32005 posted...
    If you still support trump you’re a traitor


    If you ever supported Trump you're a traitor. 

    pleb.
    I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience. Patrick Henry
    Antifar posted...
    darkjedilink posted...

    'Inside sources'

    Is it newsworthy? Absolutely. However, TC's claim is false.

    You're accusing NBC of fabricating this story without any proof. And you're gonna need proof.


    ...and @darkjedilink was never heard from again..
    I am Amp
    eston 1 day ago#31
    EverHeardOfIt posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    EverHeardOfIt posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

    Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.

    The story was negative, not false. Trump claims everything is fake, what do you expect?

    Really? You were in the meeting?

    Just based on his track record if Trump says something is fake it's probably true.

    This does seem to be the case at least 90% of the time
    --kresnik-- posted...
    He didn't "have the power" to make the NFL crybabies stand, but he sure did.

    To be fair, Trump wasn't directly responsible for that. His whining drove his base to bitch about the NFL en masse, and Roger Goodell is such a greedy, spineless pussy that he was going to cave eventually.
    CocteauQuintplt posted...
    Antifar posted...
    darkjedilink posted...

    'Inside sources'

    Is it newsworthy? Absolutely. However, TC's claim is false.

    You're accusing NBC of fabricating this story without any proof. And you're gonna need proof.


    ...and @darkjedilink was never heard from again..

    78mVQxQ
    Asherlee10 1 day ago#34
    "challenge their licenses"

    lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.
    "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
    CocteauQuintplt posted...
    Antifar posted...
    darkjedilink posted...

    'Inside sources'

    Is it newsworthy? Absolutely. However, TC's claim is false.

    You're accusing NBC of fabricating this story without any proof. And you're gonna need proof.

    ...and @darkjedilink was never heard from again..

    Actually, the President is, which is why we're here.
    'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
    Asherlee10 posted...
    "challenge their licenses"

    lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

    Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?
    'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
    darkjedilink posted...
    CocteauQuintplt posted...
    Antifar posted...
    darkjedilink posted...

    'Inside sources'

    Is it newsworthy? Absolutely. However, TC's claim is false.

    You're accusing NBC of fabricating this story without any proof. And you're gonna need proof.

    ...and @darkjedilink was never heard from again..

    Actually, the President is, which is why we're here.

    The guy who makes up fake news on an at least weekly basis.
    Asherlee10 1 day ago#38
    darkjedilink posted...
    Asherlee10 posted...
    "challenge their licenses"

    lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

    Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?


    Networks do not have the broadcasting licenses. The local companies do. This sums it up well:

    The FCC, an independent federal agency, issues broadcast licenses to stations and oversees license holders. It does not license networks. NBC is owned by Comcast, which holds broadcast licenses for several stations. NBC also airs on affiliate stations owned by other companies.

    Local residents or competitors can file a challenge to a station’s license renewal, but the basis for such a challenge is extremely limited — it must be a case where the station systematically violated the FCC’s rules or lacked the requisite “character” to hold the license. That is usually defined as a felony conviction, said Andrew Schwartzman, a communications lawyer with the Institute for Public Representation at Georgetown University Law Center.
    "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
    darkjedilink posted...
    CocteauQuintplt posted...
    Antifar posted...
    darkjedilink posted...

    'Inside sources'

    Is it newsworthy? Absolutely. However, TC's claim is false.

    You're accusing NBC of fabricating this story without any proof. And you're gonna need proof.

    ...and @darkjedilink was never heard from again..

    Actually, the President is, which is why we're here.


    So you came back with no proof that this story is fake? Got it
    I am Amp
    CableZL 1 day ago#40
    darkjedilink posted...
    Asherlee10 posted...
    "challenge their licenses"

    lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

    Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?


    It does, but airing a negative story about the president isn't a valid reason to revoke their broadcast license.
    Antifar 1 day ago#41
    darkjedilink posted...
    Actually, the President is, which is why we're here.

    Okay, the President is accusing NBC of fabricating this story without any proof. He's gonna need proof.
    kin to all that throbs
    CableZL posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    Asherlee10 posted...
    "challenge their licenses"

    lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

    Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?

    It does, but airing a negative story about the president isn't a valid reason to revoke their broadcast license.

    Once again, the President is saying it's false.
    'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
    NBC is literally progenitor zero for all the liberal advocacy against Trump so if it was anyone that he was gonna pick it would be them
    Joffery Baratheon did nothing wrong. (1 month rent-a-sig)
    President Trump is awesome. (1 month rent-a-sig)
    Antifar posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    Actually, the President is, which is why we're here.

    Okay, the President is accusing NBC of fabricating this story without any proof. He's gonna need proof.

    I don't disagree.

    That doesn't absolve TC of intentionally misrepresenting the President's tweet.
    'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
    darkjedilink posted...
    CableZL posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    Asherlee10 posted...
    "challenge their licenses"

    lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

    Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?

    It does, but airing a negative story about the president isn't a valid reason to revoke their broadcast license.

    Once again, the President is saying it's false.


    And the president is a proven liar. Next.
    I am Amp
    Asherlee10 posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    Asherlee10 posted...
    "challenge their licenses"

    lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

    Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?


    Networks do not have the broadcasting licenses. The local companies do. This sums it up well:

    The FCC, an independent federal agency, issues broadcast licenses to stations and oversees license holders. It does not license networks. NBC is owned by Comcast, which holds broadcast licenses for several stations. NBC also airs on affiliate stations owned by other companies.

    Local residents or competitors can file a challenge to a station’s license renewal, but the basis for such a challenge is extremely limited — it must be a case where the station systematically violated the FCC’s rules or lacked the requisite “character” to hold the license. That is usually defined as a felony conviction, said Andrew Schwartzman, a communications lawyer with the Institute for Public Representation at Georgetown University Law Center.

    So the FCC had no legal standing to block the Comcast buyout of NBC...
    'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
    darkjedilink posted...
    CableZL posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    Asherlee10 posted...
    "challenge their licenses"

    lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

    Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?

    It does, but airing a negative story about the president isn't a valid reason to revoke their broadcast license.

    Once again, the President is saying it's false.

    The President is a known liar. Next point?
    Heineken14 1 day ago#48
    SuperGamer5 posted...
    --kresnik-- posted...
    He didn't "have the power" to make the NFL crybabies stand, but he sure did.

    To be fair, Trump wasn't directly responsible for that. His whining drove his base to bitch about the NFL en masse, and Roger Goodell is such a greedy, spineless pussy that he was going to cave eventually.


    Technically he hasn't caved yet, just played lip service to the whiny snowflakes. The memo says players SHOULD stand.
    Rage is a hell of an anesthetic.
    Heineken14 1 day ago#49
    Antifar posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    Actually, the President is, which is why we're here.

    Okay, the President is accusing NBC of fabricating this story without any proof. He's gonna need proof.


    That proof is coming right after his taxes, his IQ results, his medical records, and the proof of Obama wiretapping his campaign headquarters.
    Rage is a hell of an anesthetic.
    Bullet_Wing posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    CableZL posted...
    darkjedilink posted...
    Asherlee10 posted...
    "challenge their licenses"

    lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

    Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?

    It does, but airing a negative story about the president isn't a valid reason to revoke their broadcast license.

    Once again, the President is saying it's false.

    The President is a known liar. Next point?

    My point is that you can't argue that he said it was a negative story, because he didn't say it.
    'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
    1. Boards
    2. Current Events
    3. Trump just said he wants to take NBC off air cuz they ran negative story on him
      1. Boards
      2. Current Events
      3. Trump just said he wants to take NBC off air cuz they ran negative story on him
      CableZL 1 day ago#51
      darkjedilink posted...
      Bullet_Wing posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      CableZL posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      "challenge their licenses"

      lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

      Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?

      It does, but airing a negative story about the president isn't a valid reason to revoke their broadcast license.

      Once again, the President is saying it's false.

      The President is a known liar. Next point?

      My point is that you can't argue that he said it was a negative story, because he didn't say it.


      The president says everything negative against him is false.
      Supposedly this latest ignorant display by Trump (the actual discussion, not his childish ranting), was what prompted Tillerson to call him a fucking moron.
      CableZL 1 day ago#53
      And really, if airing false news stories was enough reason to revoke a broadcast license, then Infowars and Breitbart would no longer have broadcast licenses, let alone white house press credentials.
      (edited 1 day ago)reportquote
      EverHeardOfIt 1 day ago#54
      darkjedilink posted...
      My point is that you can't argue that he said it was a negative story, because he didn't say it.

      Lemme put clause identifying parentheses around my topic title cause I think you're misunderstanding:

      [Trump just said (he wants to take NBC off air)] cuz they ran negative story on him

      NOT

      [Trump just said (he wants to take NBC off air cuz they ran negative story on him)]
      Antifar 1 day ago#55
      CableZL posted...
      And really, if airing false news stories was enough reason to revoke a broadcast license, then Infowars and Breitbart would no longer have broadcast licenses.

      They do not and never have had broadcasting licenses. The FCC has control over the airwaves: radio and broadcast TV. You don't need a license to set up a newspaper or website.
      kin to all that throbs
      (edited 1 day ago)reportquote
      CableZL 1 day ago#57
      Antifar posted...
      CableZL posted...
      And really, if airing false news stories was enough reason to revoke a broadcast license, then Infowars and Breitbart would no longer have broadcast licenses.

      They do not and never have had broadcasting licenses. The FCC has control over the airwaves: radio and broadcast TV. You don't need a license to set up a newspaper or website.


      For some reason, I thought they had FM radio shows. My mistake.
      Antifar 1 day ago#58
      CableZL posted...
      For some reason, I thought they had FM radio shows.

      Alex Jones might have a radio show actually; I don't know for sure.
      kin to all that throbs
      Antifar 1 day ago#59
      metralo 1 day ago#60
      this is all in the first year folks

      he's gonna get significantly worse as time goes on. haha take that liherals :)
      darkjedilink posted...
      My point is that you can't argue that he said it was a negative story, because he didn't say it.

      your semantic point doesn't argue anything because he wouldn't negatively respond to a fake story if he didn't perceive it as painting him in a negative light

      sticking to the literal argument here is the same as saying nothing because the contextual progression is obvious
      And in an infinite regress, tell me, why is the pain of birth lighter borne than the pain of death?
      C_Pain 1 day ago#62
      Same thing as marking a message here you don't like.

      So we get it.
      How quaint.
      He wants north Korean/Soviet level media control.
      No sig.
      CableZL posted...
      And really, if airing false news stories was enough reason to revoke a broadcast license, then Infowars and Breitbart would no longer have broadcast licenses, let alone white house press credentials.

      I'm pretty sure neither of those groups have TV stations, and the FCC doesn't control who gets a press pass.
      'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
      Asherlee10 1 day ago#65
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      "challenge their licenses"

      lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

      Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?


      Networks do not have the broadcasting licenses. The local companies do. This sums it up well:

      The FCC, an independent federal agency, issues broadcast licenses to stations and oversees license holders. It does not license networks. NBC is owned by Comcast, which holds broadcast licenses for several stations. NBC also airs on affiliate stations owned by other companies.

      Local residents or competitors can file a challenge to a station’s license renewal, but the basis for such a challenge is extremely limited — it must be a case where the station systematically violated the FCC’s rules or lacked the requisite “character” to hold the license. That is usually defined as a felony conviction, said Andrew Schwartzman, a communications lawyer with the Institute for Public Representation at Georgetown University Law Center.

      So the FCC had no legal standing to block the Comcast buyout of NBC...


      I don't believe so. Why do you think that's relevant to this topic? NBC doesn't hold a broadcasting license like Trump thinks they do, which is why I said "I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way."
      "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
      CableZL 1 day ago#66
      Asherlee10 posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      "challenge their licenses"

      lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

      Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?


      Networks do not have the broadcasting licenses. The local companies do. This sums it up well:

      The FCC, an independent federal agency, issues broadcast licenses to stations and oversees license holders. It does not license networks. NBC is owned by Comcast, which holds broadcast licenses for several stations. NBC also airs on affiliate stations owned by other companies.

      Local residents or competitors can file a challenge to a station’s license renewal, but the basis for such a challenge is extremely limited — it must be a case where the station systematically violated the FCC’s rules or lacked the requisite “character” to hold the license. That is usually defined as a felony conviction, said Andrew Schwartzman, a communications lawyer with the Institute for Public Representation at Georgetown University Law Center.

      So the FCC had no legal standing to block the Comcast buyout of NBC...


      I don't believe so. Why do you think that's relevant to this topic? NBC doesn't hold a broadcasting license like Trump thinks they do, which is why I said "I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way."


      I'm pretty sure the FCC didn't block the Comcast buyout of NBC since NBC is now owned by Comcast.
      Asherlee10 posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      "challenge their licenses"

      lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

      Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?


      Networks do not have the broadcasting licenses. The local companies do. This sums it up well:

      The FCC, an independent federal agency, issues broadcast licenses to stations and oversees license holders. It does not license networks. NBC is owned by Comcast, which holds broadcast licenses for several stations. NBC also airs on affiliate stations owned by other companies.

      Local residents or competitors can file a challenge to a station’s license renewal, but the basis for such a challenge is extremely limited — it must be a case where the station systematically violated the FCC’s rules or lacked the requisite “character” to hold the license. That is usually defined as a felony conviction, said Andrew Schwartzman, a communications lawyer with the Institute for Public Representation at Georgetown University Law Center.

      So the FCC had no legal standing to block the Comcast buyout of NBC...

      I don't believe so. Why do you think that's relevant to this topic? NBC doesn't hold a broadcasting license like Trump thinks they do, which is why I said "I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way."

      It's relevant because liberals used the FCC as a cudgel during that buyout.

      It's called precedent.
      'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
      Asherlee10 1 day ago#68
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      "challenge their licenses"

      lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

      Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?


      Networks do not have the broadcasting licenses. The local companies do. This sums it up well:

      The FCC, an independent federal agency, issues broadcast licenses to stations and oversees license holders. It does not license networks. NBC is owned by Comcast, which holds broadcast licenses for several stations. NBC also airs on affiliate stations owned by other companies.

      Local residents or competitors can file a challenge to a station’s license renewal, but the basis for such a challenge is extremely limited — it must be a case where the station systematically violated the FCC’s rules or lacked the requisite “character” to hold the license. That is usually defined as a felony conviction, said Andrew Schwartzman, a communications lawyer with the Institute for Public Representation at Georgetown University Law Center.

      So the FCC had no legal standing to block the Comcast buyout of NBC...

      I don't believe so. Why do you think that's relevant to this topic? NBC doesn't hold a broadcasting license like Trump thinks they do, which is why I said "I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way."

      It's relevant because liberals used the FCC as a cudgel during that buyout.

      It's called precedent.


      What are you on about?
      "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
      CableZL posted...
      And really, if airing false news stories was enough reason to revoke a broadcast license, then Infowars and Breitbart would no longer have broadcast licenses, let alone white house press credentials.

      But they suck Trump's dick daily, so they're okay.
      Posted with GameRaven 3.3
      Bishop9800 1 day ago#70
      Phantom_Nook posted...
      CableZL posted...
      And really, if airing false news stories was enough reason to revoke a broadcast license, then Infowars and Breitbart would no longer have broadcast licenses, let alone white house press credentials.

      But they suck Trump's dick daily, so they're okay.


      Along with darkjedilink
      I don't have to insult you. I have proven that you are a hypocrite and a fool. That's not insulting you, that's exposing you.
      PSN-Bishop9800
      I find it worrying that a president essentially threatens to silence news he dislikes and that people read it and they cheer it on like it's something positive.

      I want to believe southcoast and darkjedilink are both trolls, I really do.
      Bishop9800 posted...
      Phantom_Nook posted...
      CableZL posted...
      And really, if airing false news stories was enough reason to revoke a broadcast license, then Infowars and Breitbart would no longer have broadcast licenses, let alone white house press credentials.

      But they suck Trump's dick daily, so they're okay.

      Along with darkjedilink

      How so?
      'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
      EverHeardOfIt 1 day ago#73
      darkjedilink posted...
      How so?

      By constantly defending a dementia-riddled man by taking the devil's advocate in even the most absurd scenarios?
      Zeeak4444 1 day ago#74
      EverHeardOfIt posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      How so?

      By constantly defending a dementia-riddled man by taking the devil's advocate in even the most absurd scenarios?


      He doesn't take the devils advocate. He just has garbage opinions.
      Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
      EverHeardOfIt posted...
      hahahahaha


      hahahahaha
      sigless user is me or am I?
      Bishop9800 1 day ago#76
      Zeeak4444 posted...
      He doesn't take the devils advocate. He just has garbage opinions.


      Nah, he's just plain garbage
      I don't have to insult you. I have proven that you are a hypocrite and a fool. That's not insulting you, that's exposing you.
      PSN-Bishop9800
      Heineken14 1 day ago#77
      darkjedilink posted...
      Bishop9800 posted...
      Phantom_Nook posted...
      CableZL posted...
      And really, if airing false news stories was enough reason to revoke a broadcast license, then Infowars and Breitbart would no longer have broadcast licenses, let alone white house press credentials.

      But they suck Trump's dick daily, so they're okay.

      Along with darkjedilink

      How so?


      Probably with your mouth, and very poorly.
      Rage is a hell of an anesthetic.
      Bishop9800 1 day ago#78
      Heineken14 posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Bishop9800 posted...
      Phantom_Nook posted...
      CableZL posted...
      And really, if airing false news stories was enough reason to revoke a broadcast license, then Infowars and Breitbart would no longer have broadcast licenses, let alone white house press credentials.

      But they suck Trump's dick daily, so they're okay.

      Along with darkjedilink

      How so?


      Probably with your mouth, and very poorly.


      DAMN!!!
      I don't have to insult you. I have proven that you are a hypocrite and a fool. That's not insulting you, that's exposing you.
      PSN-Bishop9800
      EverHeardOfIt posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      How so?

      By constantly defending a dementia-riddled man by taking the devil's advocate in even the most absurd scenarios?

      When have I ever "defended" Donald Trump?

      Pointing out that people are making things up about him to attack him isn't "defending" him.
      'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
      Th3Truth 1 day ago#80
      loltrump
      Username to post ratio 1:1
      Antifar 1 day ago#81
      Asherlee10 1 day ago#82
      Asherlee10 posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      "challenge their licenses"

      lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

      Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?


      Networks do not have the broadcasting licenses. The local companies do. This sums it up well:

      The FCC, an independent federal agency, issues broadcast licenses to stations and oversees license holders. It does not license networks. NBC is owned by Comcast, which holds broadcast licenses for several stations. NBC also airs on affiliate stations owned by other companies.

      Local residents or competitors can file a challenge to a station’s license renewal, but the basis for such a challenge is extremely limited — it must be a case where the station systematically violated the FCC’s rules or lacked the requisite “character” to hold the license. That is usually defined as a felony conviction, said Andrew Schwartzman, a communications lawyer with the Institute for Public Representation at Georgetown University Law Center.

      So the FCC had no legal standing to block the Comcast buyout of NBC...

      I don't believe so. Why do you think that's relevant to this topic? NBC doesn't hold a broadcasting license like Trump thinks they do, which is why I said "I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way."

      It's relevant because liberals used the FCC as a cudgel during that buyout.

      It's called precedent.


      What are you on about?


      I'm still curious as to what you meant here @darkjedilink
      "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
      badasstion 1 day ago#83
      darkjedilink posted...
      To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

      Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.
      Asherlee10 1 day ago#84
      badasstion posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

      Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.


      It doesn't matter. He doesn't understand how broadcasting licenses work, not surprising.
      "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
      #85
      (message deleted)
      badasstion 1 day ago#86
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

      Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.


      It doesn't matter. He doesn't understand how broadcasting licenses work, not surprising.


      I know, right. Cuz like, my message board dwelling ass is so superior to him. Cuz drumpf is a big stupid doodoo head amirite?
      Asherlee10 1 day ago#87
      badasstion posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

      Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.


      It doesn't matter. He doesn't understand how broadcasting licenses work, not surprising.


      I know, right. Cuz like, my message board dwelling ass is so superior to him. Cuz drumpf is a big stupid doodoo head amirite?


      I don't understand about 60% of what you are trying to say here.
      "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
      badasstion 1 day ago#88
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

      Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.


      It doesn't matter. He doesn't understand how broadcasting licenses work, not surprising.


      I know, right. Cuz like, my message board dwelling ass is so superior to him. Cuz drumpf is a big stupid doodoo head amirite?


      I don't understand about 60% of what you are trying to say here.


      Not surprising.
      Asherlee10 1 day ago#89
      badasstion posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

      Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.


      It doesn't matter. He doesn't understand how broadcasting licenses work, not surprising.


      I know, right. Cuz like, my message board dwelling ass is so superior to him. Cuz drumpf is a big stupid doodoo head amirite?


      I don't understand about 60% of what you are trying to say here.


      Not surprising.


      You're right, it isn't when you try to convey a thought like a 6 year old.
      "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
      badasstion 1 day ago#90
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

      Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.


      It doesn't matter. He doesn't understand how broadcasting licenses work, not surprising.


      I know, right. Cuz like, my message board dwelling ass is so superior to him. Cuz drumpf is a big stupid doodoo head amirite?


      I don't understand about 60% of what you are trying to say here.


      Not surprising.


      You're right, it isn't when I have the comprehension of a 6 year old.


      Not surprising
      badasstion posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

      Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.


      It doesn't matter. He doesn't understand how broadcasting licenses work, not surprising.


      I know, right. Cuz like, my message board dwelling ass is so superior to him. Cuz drumpf is a big stupid doodoo head amirite?


      Stop deflecting, and while you're at it stop embarrassingly enabling the government in wanting to shut down news outlets that are unflattering or disapproving of them. For all of the bitching CE does about Communists we'd be living in some sort of hilarious Maoist China parody before long if the shit people post here was taken at face value most of the time
      butts
      Zeeak4444 1 day ago#92
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

      Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.


      It doesn't matter. He doesn't understand how broadcasting licenses work, not surprising.


      I know, right. Cuz like, my message board dwelling ass is so superior to him. Cuz drumpf is a big stupid doodoo head amirite?


      I don't understand about 60% of what you are trying to say here.


      It was a poor attempt to mock you. He suggested that Trump knows more about licensing than you do and firmly believes Trump wouldn't talk about a subject he's clueless about, despite all evidence disagreeing with him.
      Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
      (edited 1 day ago)reportquote
      badasstion 1 day ago#93
      Zeeak4444 posted...
      lisensing


      Lmao yeah, but you know what you're talking about hahaha!
      Asherlee10 1 day ago#94
      When you have to result to changing what was quoted in order to feel like you "won," that's mighty sad. 

      However, that's expected when you're this wrong about something.
      "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
      Zeeak4444 1 day ago#95
      badasstion posted...
      Zeeak4444 posted...
      lisensing


      Lmao yeah, but you know what you're talking about hahaha!


      Thanks, I fixed it now. Glad that was the only issue with my post.
      Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
      (edited 1 day ago)reportquote
      Asherlee10 1 day ago#96
      badasstion posted...
      Zeeak4444 posted...
      lisensing


      Lmao yeah, but you know what you're talking about hahaha!


      Actually he does know what he's talking about, he's able to grasp the simple concept that seems to perplex you.
      "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
      badasstion 1 day ago#97
      ultimate reaver posted...
      badasstion posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      To be fair, it wasn't because 'negative.' He claims it's false.

      Of course, can't expect CElibs to be intellectually honest, or factually correct.


      It doesn't matter. He doesn't understand how broadcasting licenses work, not surprising.


      I know, right. Cuz like, my message board dwelling ass is so superior to him. Cuz drumpf is a big stupid doodoo head amirite?


      Stop deflecting, and while you're at it stop embarrassingly enabling the government in wanting to shut down news outlets that are unflattering or disapproving of them. For all of the bitching CE does about Communists we'd be living in some sort of hilarious Maoist China parody before long if the shit people post here was taken at face value most of the time


      As long as you say it would be a travesty to shut down the fake news networks (that literally has 100% of the country's youth brainwashed to vote based on intense emotions and to think neo-nazism and gay rights and republican nazis are huge problems in the world today) then it would be, amirite? I'm not
      Asherlee10 1 day ago#98
      badasstion posted...
      As long as you say it would be a travesty to shut down the fake news networks (that literally has 100% of the country's youth brainwashed to vote based on intense emotions and to think neo-nazism and gay rights and republican nazis are huge problems in the world today) then it would be, amirite? I'm not


      You are remarkably terrible about conveying thoughts and ideas. It's astounding.
      "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
      badasstion 1 day ago#99
      Asherlee10 posted...
      badasstion posted...
      As long as you say it would be a travesty to shut down the fake news networks (that literally has 100% of the country's youth brainwashed to vote based on intense emotions and to think neo-nazism and gay rights and republican nazis are huge problems in the world today) then it would be, amirite? I'm not


      You are remarkably terrible about conveying thoughts and ideas. It's astounding.


      When you have to cover up for your toddler-level reading comprehension by acting like it's the fault of others, that's mighty sad. Lmao
      darkjedilink posted...
      CableZL posted...
      darkjedilink posted...
      Asherlee10 posted...
      "challenge their licenses"

      lol - okay. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way for networks like NBC.

      Are you saying that NBC doesn't fall under FCC purview?

      It does, but airing a negative story about the president isn't a valid reason to revoke their broadcast license.

      Once again, the President is saying it's false.


      The President is a known liar.
      Sick liaisons raise this monumental mark
      The sun sets forever over Blackwater Park
      1. Boards
      2. Current Events
      3. Trump just said he wants to take NBC off air cuz they ran negative story on him
        1. Boards
        2. Current Events
        3. Trump just said he wants to take NBC off air cuz they ran negative story on him
        badasstion posted...
        When you have to cover up for your toddler-level reading comprehension by acting like it's the fault of others, that's mighty sad. Lmao


        So pretty much Trump on a daily basis?
        The Great Muta 22 posted...
        badasstion posted...
        When you have to cover up for your toddler-level reading comprehension by acting like it's the fault of others, that's mighty sad. Lmao


        So pretty much Trump on a daily basis?


        No?
        badasstion posted...
        The Great Muta 22 posted...
        badasstion posted...
        When you have to cover up for your toddler-level reading comprehension by acting like it's the fault of others, that's mighty sad. Lmao


        So pretty much Trump on a daily basis?


        No?


        You are nothing but an uneducated troll. Shit, that might be too high praise for you, you are so bottom-barrel. What is your main account, you know-nothing, low-information, race-baiting malcontent?
        I am Amp
        badasstion posted...
        Asherlee10 posted...
        badasstion posted...
        As long as you say it would be a travesty to shut down the fake news networks (that literally has 100% of the country's youth brainwashed to vote based on intense emotions and to think neo-nazism and gay rights and republican nazis are huge problems in the world today) then it would be, amirite? I'm not


        You are remarkably terrible about conveying thoughts and ideas. It's astounding.


        When you have to cover up for your toddler-level reading comprehension by acting like it's the fault of others, that's mighty sad. Lmao


        Says the guy that actually types like a child instead of conveying a thought appropriately:

        badasstion posted...
        Cuz like, my message board dwelling ass is so superior to him. Cuz drumpf is a big stupid doodoo head amirite?
        "Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
        Antifar posted...
        --kresnik-- posted...
        He needs to make a public appearance, in which he announces massive personal lawsuits against the major news outlets for lying and claiming he'd been raped. That's slander and they need to pay.

        No, that would be totalitarian bullshit.

        Totalitarianism is fine when Trump does it, it seems.
        CocteauQuintplt posted...
        badasstion posted...
        The Great Muta 22 posted...
        badasstion posted...
        When you have to cover up for your toddler-level reading comprehension by acting like it's the fault of others, that's mighty sad. Lmao


        So pretty much Trump on a daily basis?


        No?


        You are nothing but an uneducated troll. Shit, that might be too high praise for you, you are so bottom-barrel. What is your main account, you know-nothing, low-information, race-baiting malcontent?


        Lmao oh look, a liberal temper tantrum. You never see those nowadays. Hahaha I win.
        Asherlee10 posted...
        badasstion posted...
        Asherlee10 posted...
        badasstion posted...
        As long as you say it would be a travesty to shut down the fake news networks (that literally has 100% of the country's youth brainwashed to vote based on intense emotions and to think neo-nazism and gay rights and republican nazis are huge problems in the world today) then it would be, amirite? I'm not


        You are remarkably terrible about conveying thoughts and ideas. It's astounding.


        When you have to cover up for your toddler-level reading comprehension by acting like it's the fault of others, that's mighty sad. Lmao


        Says the guy that actually types like a child instead of conveying a thought appropriately:

        badasstion posted...
        Cuz like, my message board dwelling ass is so superior to him. Cuz drumpf is a big stupid doodoo head amirite?


        I'm cringing really hard from you acting like that's the hardest thing to understand. Like, you think you totally got something on me but you're really just making yourself seem not bright at all for having 0 comprehension whatsoever lmao. You're making this way too easy.
        badasstion posted...
        CocteauQuintplt posted...
        badasstion posted...
        The Great Muta 22 posted...
        badasstion posted...
        When you have to cover up for your toddler-level reading comprehension by acting like it's the fault of others, that's mighty sad. Lmao


        So pretty much Trump on a daily basis?


        No?


        You are nothing but an uneducated troll. Shit, that might be too high praise for you, you are so bottom-barrel. What is your main account, you know-nothing, low-information, race-baiting malcontent?


        Lmao oh look, a liberal temper tantrum. You never see those nowadays. Hahaha I win.


        You look foolish, so you.. won? This is why nobody respects the mind of a Trump supporter.
        I am Amp
        badasstion 20 hours ago#109
        CocteauQuintplt posted...
        badasstion posted...
        CocteauQuintplt posted...
        badasstion posted...
        The Great Muta 22 posted...
        badasstion posted...
        When you have to cover up for your toddler-level reading comprehension by acting like it's the fault of others, that's mighty sad. Lmao


        So pretty much Trump on a daily basis?


        No?


        You are nothing but an uneducated troll. Shit, that might be too high praise for you, you are so bottom-barrel. What is your main account, you know-nothing, low-information, race-baiting malcontent?


        Lmao oh look, a liberal temper tantrum. You never see those nowadays. Hahaha I win.


        You look foolish, so you.. won? This is why nobody respects the mind of a Trump supporter.


        So you... think I care about your respect? This is why you lost lmfao
        badasstion posted...
        CocteauQuintplt posted...
        badasstion posted...
        CocteauQuintplt posted...
        badasstion posted...
        The Great Muta 22 posted...
        badasstion posted...
        When you have to cover up for your toddler-level reading comprehension by acting like it's the fault of others, that's mighty sad. Lmao


        So pretty much Trump on a daily basis?


        No?


        You are nothing but an uneducated troll. Shit, that might be too high praise for you, you are so bottom-barrel. What is your main account, you know-nothing, low-information, race-baiting malcontent?


        Lmao oh look, a liberal temper tantrum. You never see those nowadays. Hahaha I win.


        You look foolish, so you.. won? This is why nobody respects the mind of a Trump supporter.


        So you... think I care about your respect? This is why you lost lmfao


        I don't think you care about respect in any capacity, it is one of you major flaws. You are actively disrespectful to good users.
        I am Amp
        badasstion 14 hours ago#111
        CocteauQuintplt posted...
        it is one of you major flaws.


        They're after me major flaws.
        BignutzisBack 12 hours ago#112
        @badasstion looking like a complete fool lol, I get how you are now your other terrible posts in topics are making sense
        (edited 12 hours ago)reportquote
        badasstion 12 hours ago#113
        BignutzisBack posted...
        @badasstion looking like a complete fool lol, I get how you are now your other terrible posts in topics are making sense


        What's ironic is this post with hellish grammar and terrible thought conveyance talking about making sense.
        badasstion posted...
        BignutzisBack posted...
        @badasstion looking like a complete fool lol, I get how you are now your other terrible posts in topics are making sense


        What's ironic is this post with hellish grammar and terrible thought conveyance talking about making sense.

        Now this guy, he has bad words, the worst words! I have plenty of people, the best people, telling me that he has bad words
        - literal garbage
        BignutzisBack 12 hours ago#115
        literal_garbage posted...
        badasstion posted...
        BignutzisBack posted...
        @badasstion looking like a complete fool lol, I get how you are now your other terrible posts in topics are making sense


        What's ironic is this post with hellish grammar and terrible thought conveyance talking about making sense.

        Now this guy, he has bad words, the worst words! I have plenty of people, the best people, telling me that he has bad words


        your thought conveyance is no match for my Trump Towers
        1. Boards
        2. Current Events 
        3. Trump just said he wants to take NBC off air cuz they ran negative story on him

    No comments:

    Post a Comment